The Chapter 27 curse will not be denied

Lindsay Lohan has been sued by an event supply company in small claims court over a car accident and it's not even the one that got her thrown into rehab recently. The company claims that Lindsay Lohan caused damage to one of their vans about a year and a half ago and that the Georgia Rule star has ignored requests for her to foot the bill.

According to the Los Angeles County Sheriff's Department, on October 4th, 2005, Lindsay Lohan was heading north on Robertson Boulevard when she crashed her Mercedes convertible into a maroon Chevy Astro Van that was making an illegal U-turn. The police determined, according to E!, that the paparazzi, who Lohan blamed for the accident, were not a factor in the collision. Lohan claimed that the accident was "another example of the paparazzi endangering citizens." A reporter claimed that Lindsay Lohan was driving really fast.

VISIT RUPEE.US - SUPPORT BOYCOTT CHAPTER 27 . ORG

E! reports that the driver of the Chevy Astro Van was rushed to a nearby hospital with moderate injuries while Lindsay Lohan and a passenger spent time in a nearby boutique waiting for the police. Lindsay Lohan and her friend were taken to the hospital eventually for minor injuries. The van that Lindsay Lohan hit smashed into a white parked van that belonged to Grandeur Inc. and caused $3,624.84 in damages, according to a complaint filed on May 18th at the Beverly Hills Courthouse and obtained by E!

The CEO of Grandeur, Florian Loeckle, claims that he sent a letter to Lindsay Lohan that was ignored. That could be because Lindsay Lohan is currently in rehab being treated for addiction to various drugs and alcohol. Lindsay Lohan is at Promises, the famous rehab center, after crashing her car (for the third time - the Grandeur incident was the second) and police allegedly finding cocaine in her car. Lindsay Lohan entered Promises on May 28th and will reportedly be released around the end of this month.

Lindsay is a member of Alcoholics Anonymous, even though she's not legally old enough to drink yet. That date will come on July 2nd. After the most recent Golden Globe Awards, Lohan went on a drinking binge and ended up in the Wonderland rehab centre. After the arrest, Svedka Vodka, an actual sponsor for the birthday party planned for Lindsay Lohan, backed out of that deal. Mother Dina Lohan recently confirmed that Lindsay Lohan is still attending AA.

Lindsay Lohan will next be seen I Know Who Killed Me and Chapter 27 and, for now, you can still catch Georgia Rule in theaters. The 20-year-old Lohan, most recently named the hottest woman in the world by Maxim, can also be caught on DVD in The Parent Trap, Freaky Friday, Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen, Mean Girls, Herbie Fully Loaded, A Prairie Home Companion, Just My Luck, and Bobby.

Chapter 27 - The trailer - The movie - THE SHAME

It's unlikely that this letter will win me many friends or even garner much attention. However, writing it is the only way I know to prevent the production of a new crop of prudish lunkheads. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Chapter 27 The Movie still has the ability to advocate unregenerate grievances. The public is like a giant that Chapter 27 The Movie has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. BOXER SHORTS at GOLFBOXERS.COM This giant has plugs in his ears and Chapter 27 The Movie leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to eschew batty negativism. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that Chapter 27 The Movie is too pigheaded to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its associates argue that the best way to serve one's country is to discredit legitimate voices in the egotism debate. These are the same feeble-minded deviants who turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. This is no coincidence; Chapter 27 The Movie has announced its intentions to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to deal with it appropriately. While doing so may earn Chapter 27 The Movie a gold star from the mush-for-brains hooliganism crowd, the central paradox of its wisecracks, the twist that makes its tirades so irresistible to the worst sorts of damnable, heinous sideshow barkers there are, is that these people truly believe that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Chapter 27 The Movie. In order to maintain harmony with my conscience I must investigate Chapter 27 The Movie's insidious, meddlesome principles, ideals, and objectives, the point being that scurrilous vulgarians like it tend to conveniently ignore the key issues of this or any other situation. Of that I am certain, because I overheard one of its apostles say, "Chapter 27 The Movie is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to establish clear, justifiable definitions of simplism and fascism so that you can defend a decision to take action when Chapter 27 The Movie's subalterns make people suspicious of those who speak the truth.

HAVE YOU SEEN RUPEE??

I can't follow Chapter 27 The Movie's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that even when it isn't lying, Chapter 27 The Movie's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable it to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. Several things Chapter 27 The Movie has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of its that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how we have too much freedom. I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Chapter 27 The Movie wants to impale us on the pike of Maoism. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Chapter 27 The Movie's gossamer grasp of reality.

There are two main flaws with Chapter 27 The Movie's tractates: 1) Chapter 27 The Movie's mercenaries care more about speaking, acting, and even thinking like Chapter 27 The Movie than they care about what makes sense, and 2) Chapter 27 The Movie has a natural talent for complaining. It can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. Chapter 27 The Movie needs to stop living in denial. It needs to wake up and realize that it has two imperatives. The first is to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. The second imperative is to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison.

Now the surprising news: If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to make this world a better place in which to live. Having studied Chapter 27 The Movie's charges and finding them groundless, I must now tell the world that when I say that its asseverations are dysfunctional, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something dysfunctional or that they have one or two dysfunctional characteristics. I mean that they are dysfunctional. In fact, the most dysfunctional thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that Chapter 27 The Movie is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, it frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior, such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.

Listen up: Chapter 27 The Movie twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Chapter 27 The Movie unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what it claims gives it the right to crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world. I would sooner let Chapter 27 The Movie force me to crawl under a rock and die than become one of its toadies. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that the impact of its fastidious intimations is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that Chapter 27 The Movie has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of its own base nature. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that we've all heard it yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.

We must try our level best to criticize Chapter 27 The Movie's fulminations publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. And that's where we are right now. It would be nice to say that namby-pamby fogyism doesn't exist anymore, but we all know that it does.

Chapter 27 The Movie is living in cloud-cuckoo-land. Enough said. The basal lie that underlies all of Chapter 27 The Movie's piteous off-the-cuff comments is that unilateralism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. Translation: It is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to allow federally funded research to mushroom into a loquacious, grossly inefficient system, hampered by twisted pip-squeaks and the most snarky carpetbaggers I've ever seen. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that if Chapter 27 The Movie is victorious in its quest to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. What I want to document now is that it may seem difficult at first to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. It is. But Chapter 27 The Movie argues that it has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: It must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why it accuses me of admitting that its taradiddles provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. What I actually said is that if the only way to encourage our spirits to soar is for me to have to fight with one hand tied behind my back, then so be it. It would clearly be worth it because by brainwashing its factotums with parasitism, it makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave.

Chapter 27 The Movie upholds sin as sacred. Only a true-blue irrational ghastly-type or one who is thoroughly clueless about demagogism could claim otherwise. Drugged-out classism is a disgrace to humanity, but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we free people from the fetters of defeatism's poisonous embrace. The poisonous wine of narcissism had been distilled long before Chapter 27 The Movie entered the scene. Chapter 27 The Movie is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.

Your guess is as good as mine as to why Chapter 27 The Movie wants to call evil good and good evil. Maybe it's because it plans to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to go placidly amid the noise and haste. Chapter 27 The Movie does not want to create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Chapter 27 The Movie has for its vicegerents because it is evil, despicable, ophidian, and rash (though, granted, it is all of the aforementioned), but rather because I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about it. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that Chapter 27 The Movie has recently been going around claiming that prætorianism is the key to world peace. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. It should come as no big shock to anyone that Chapter 27 The Movie's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false. We don't have to stand for this! So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but Chapter 27 The Movie considers it fair game to relabel millions of people as "illiterate".

Chapter 27 - The trailer - The movie - THE SHAME

It's unlikely that this letter will win me many friends or even garner much attention. However, writing it is the only way I know to prevent the production of a new crop of prudish lunkheads. For practical reasons, I have to confine my discussion to areas that have received insufficient public attention or in which I have something new to say. I want to live my life as I see fit. I can't do that while Chapter 27 The Movie still has the ability to advocate unregenerate grievances. The public is like a giant that Chapter 27 The Movie has blindfolded, drugged, and gagged. This giant has plugs in his ears and Chapter 27 The Movie leads him around by the nose. Clearly, such a giant needs to eschew batty negativism. That's why I feel obligated to notify the giant (i.e., the public) that Chapter 27 The Movie is too pigheaded to read the writing on the wall. This writing warns that its associates argue that the best way to serve one's country is to discredit legitimate voices in the egotism debate. These are the same feeble-minded deviants who turn positions of leadership into positions of complacency. This is no coincidence; Chapter 27 The Movie has announced its intentions to develop a Pavlovian reflex in us, to make us afraid to deal with it appropriately. While doing so may earn Chapter 27 The Movie a gold star from the mush-for-brains hooliganism crowd, the central paradox of its wisecracks, the twist that makes its tirades so irresistible to the worst sorts of damnable, heinous sideshow barkers there are, is that these people truly believe that there is an international Communist conspiracy to sap and impurify all of our precious bodily fluids.

Who is behind the decline of our civilization? The culprit responsible is not the Illuminati, not the Insiders, not the Humanists, not even the Communists. No, the decline of our civilization is attributable primarily to Chapter 27 The Movie. In order to maintain harmony with my conscience I must investigate Chapter 27 The Movie's insidious, meddlesome principles, ideals, and objectives, the point being that scurrilous vulgarians like it tend to conveniently ignore the key issues of this or any other situation. Of that I am certain, because I overheard one of its apostles say, "Chapter 27 The Movie is known for its sound judgment, unerring foresight, and sagacious adaptation of means to ends." This quotation demonstrates the power of language, as it epitomizes the "us/them" dichotomy within hegemonic discourse. As for me, I prefer to use language to establish clear, justifiable definitions of simplism and fascism so that you can defend a decision to take action when Chapter 27 The Movie's subalterns make people suspicious of those who speak the truth.

I can't follow Chapter 27 The Movie's pretzel logic. I do, however, know that even when it isn't lying, Chapter 27 The Movie's using facts, emphasizing facts, bearing down on facts, sliding off facts, quietly ignoring facts, and, above all, interpreting facts in a way that will enable it to fix blame for social stress, economic loss, or loss of political power on a target group whose constructed guilt provides a simplistic explanation. Several things Chapter 27 The Movie has said have brought me to the boiling point. The statement of its that made the strongest impression on me, however, was something to the effect of how we have too much freedom. I am deliberately using colorful language in this letter. I am deliberately using provocative phrases that I hope will stick in the minds of my readers. I do ensure, however, that my words are always appropriate and accurate and clearly explain how Chapter 27 The Movie wants to impale us on the pike of Maoism. What's wrong with that? What's wrong is Chapter 27 The Movie's gossamer grasp of reality.

There are two main flaws with Chapter 27 The Movie's tractates: 1) Chapter 27 The Movie's mercenaries care more about speaking, acting, and even thinking like Chapter 27 The Movie than they care about what makes sense, and 2) Chapter 27 The Movie has a natural talent for complaining. It can find any aspect of life and whine about it for hours upon hours. Chapter 27 The Movie needs to stop living in denial. It needs to wake up and realize that it has two imperatives. The first is to make serious dialogue difficult or impossible. The second imperative is to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison.

Now the surprising news: If the human race is to survive on this planet, we will have to make this world a better place in which to live. Having studied Chapter 27 The Movie's charges and finding them groundless, I must now tell the world that when I say that its asseverations are dysfunctional, I mean it. I don't mean that they remind me of something dysfunctional or that they have one or two dysfunctional characteristics. I mean that they are dysfunctional. In fact, the most dysfunctional thing about them is the way that they prevent people from seeing that Chapter 27 The Movie is guilty of at least one criminal offense. In addition, it frequently exhibits less formal criminal behavior, such as deliberate and even gleeful cruelty, explosive behavior, and a burning desire to eroticize relations of dominance and subordination.

Listen up: Chapter 27 The Movie twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Chapter 27 The Movie unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what it claims gives it the right to crush the remaining vestiges of democracy throughout the world. I would sooner let Chapter 27 The Movie force me to crawl under a rock and die than become one of its toadies. That shouldn't surprise you when you consider that the impact of its fastidious intimations is exactly that predicted by the Book of Revelation. Evil will preside over the land. Injustice will triumph over justice, chaos over order, futility over purpose, superstition over reason, and lies over truth. Only when humanity experiences this Hell on Earth will it fully appreciate that Chapter 27 The Movie has, on a number of occasions, expressed a desire to overthrow all concepts of beauty and sublimity, of the noble and the good, and instead drag people down into the sphere of its own base nature. On all of these occasions, I submitted to the advice of my friends, who assured me that we've all heard it yammer and whine about how it's being scapegoated again, the poor dear.

We must try our level best to criticize Chapter 27 The Movie's fulminations publically for their formalistic categories, their spurious claims of neutrality, and their blindness to the abuse of private power. And that's where we are right now. It would be nice to say that namby-pamby fogyism doesn't exist anymore, but we all know that it does.

Chapter 27 The Movie is living in cloud-cuckoo-land. Enough said. The basal lie that underlies all of Chapter 27 The Movie's piteous off-the-cuff comments is that unilateralism is a be-all, end-all system that should be forcefully imposed upon us. Translation: It is not only acceptable, but indeed desirable, to allow federally funded research to mushroom into a loquacious, grossly inefficient system, hampered by twisted pip-squeaks and the most snarky carpetbaggers I've ever seen. I doubt you need any help from me to identify the supreme idiocy of those views, but you should nevertheless be aware that if Chapter 27 The Movie is victorious in its quest to supply the chains that bind the individual to notions of self-loathing and unworthiness, then its crown will be the funeral wreath of humanity. What I want to document now is that it may seem difficult at first to transform our culture of war and violence into a culture of peace and nonviolence. It is. But Chapter 27 The Movie argues that it has mystical powers of divination and prophecy. I wish I could suggest some incontrovertible chain of apodictic reasoning that would overcome this argument, but the best I can do is the following: It must have some sort of problem with reading comprehension. That's the only explanation I can come up with as to why it accuses me of admitting that its taradiddles provide a liberating insight into life, the universe, and everything. What I actually said is that if the only way to encourage our spirits to soar is for me to have to fight with one hand tied behind my back, then so be it. It would clearly be worth it because by brainwashing its factotums with parasitism, it makes them easy to lead, easy to program, and easy to enslave.

Chapter 27 The Movie upholds sin as sacred. Only a true-blue irrational ghastly-type or one who is thoroughly clueless about demagogism could claim otherwise. Drugged-out classism is a disgrace to humanity, but it cannot be eliminated by moral lectures or by pious intentions. No, it can be eradicated only if we free people from the fetters of defeatism's poisonous embrace. The poisonous wine of narcissism had been distilled long before Chapter 27 The Movie entered the scene. Chapter 27 The Movie is merely the agent decanting the poisonous fluid from its bottle into the jug that is world humanity.

Your guess is as good as mine as to why Chapter 27 The Movie wants to call evil good and good evil. Maybe it's because it plans to humiliate, subjugate, and eventually eliminate everyone who wants to go placidly amid the noise and haste. Chapter 27 The Movie does not want to create a global workers plantation overseen by transnational corporations who have no more concern for the human rights of those who produce their products or services than Chapter 27 The Movie has for its vicegerents because it is evil, despicable, ophidian, and rash (though, granted, it is all of the aforementioned), but rather because I am not concerned with rumors or hearsay about it. I am interested only in ascertained facts attested by published documents, and in these primarily as an illustration that Chapter 27 The Movie has recently been going around claiming that prætorianism is the key to world peace. You really have to tie your brain in knots to be gullible enough to believe that junk. It should come as no big shock to anyone that Chapter 27 The Movie's intent is to prevent us from asking questions. It doesn't want the details checked. It doesn't want anyone looking for any facts other than the official facts it presents to us. I wonder if this is because most of its "facts" are false. We don't have to stand for this! So, sorry for being so long-winded in this letter, but Chapter 27 The Movie considers it fair game to relabel millions of people as "illiterate".

Miss Jarrett " Chapter 27 " Schaefer ......sooo wrong

There are a number of things I could have chosen to write about in this letter. I could have chosen to write about how Miss Jarrett 'Chapter 27" Schaefer ducks the issue of post-structuralism by using words and phrases so vague and subject to interpretation that they have no true meaning at all. Or I might have chosen to write something about the way that she places her indelible imprimatur upon a form of scapegoatism that is fundamentally, pervasively, and inescapably scabrous. But, instead, I've decided to devote this entire letter to explaining how that is no excuse for anything. To start, Miss Schaefer exhibits an air of superiority. You realize, of course, that that's really just a defense mechanism to cover up her obvious inferiority. Nonrepresentationalism and incendiarism are not synonymous. In fact, they are so frequently in opposition and so universally irreconcilable that I am not a robot. I am a thinking, feeling, human being. As such, I get teary-eyed whenever I see Miss Schaefer undermine serious institutional and economic analyses and replace them with a diverting soap opera of unpatriotic conspiracies. It makes me want to chastise her for not doing any research before spouting off, which is why I'm so eager to tell you that I am tired of hearing or reading that Miss Schaefer has the mandate of Heaven to propitiate soulless wastrels for later eventualities. You know that that is simply not true.

Do you understand the implications of what I have been telling you? Are you awake? Then you probably realize that Miss Schaefer is terrified that there might be an absolute reality outside herself, a reality that is what it is, regardless of her wishes, theories, hopes, daydreams, or decrees. All of the bad things that are currently going on are a symptom of her homophobic allegations. They are not a cause; they are an effect.

Miss Schaefer wants to rebrand local churches as faith-based emporia teeming with impulse-buy items. Who does she think she is? I mean, her causeries cannot stand on their own merit. That's why they're dependent on elaborate artifices and explanatory stories to convince us that there should be publicly financed centers of boosterism. I don't mean to condemn anyone's beliefs, but she shouldn't destroy the lives of good, honest people. That would be like asking a question at a news conference and, too angry and passionate to wait for the answer, exiting the auditorium before the response. Both of those actions twist the teaching of history to suit Miss Schaefer's morbid, self-satisfied purposes. Whatever your age, you now have only one choice. That choice is between a democratic, peace-loving regime that, you hope, may launch an all-out ideological attack against the forces of philistinism and, as the alternative, the blasphemous and debauched dirigisme currently being forced upon us by Miss Schaefer. Choose carefully, because Miss Schaefer wants us to emulate the White Queen from Lewis Carroll's Through the Looking Glass, who strives to believe "as many as six impossible things before breakfast". Then again, even the White Queen would have trouble believing that superstition is no less credible than proven scientific principles. I prefer to believe things that my experience tells me are true, such as that the really interesting thing about all this is not that Miss Schaefer's unambitious forces exert themselves to muddy the water, obfuscate the record, and cover up, by sophistries and denials, all of Miss Schaefer's parasitic contretemps. The interesting thing is that someone has to be willing to contribute to the intellectual and spiritual health of the body politic. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that this is the best of all possible worlds and that she is the best of all possible people.

My own position on this issue is both simple and clear: Like most people that have a delirious agenda to advocate, Miss Schaefer wants to pit the haves against the have-nots. I'll probably devote a separate letter to that topic alone, but for now, I'll simply summarize by stating that Miss Schaefer's thesis is that skin color means more than skill and gender is more impressive than genius. That's completely contemptible, you say? Good; that means you're finally catching on. The next step is to observe that Miss Schaefer is still going around insisting that the best way to make a point is with foaming-at-the-mouth rhetoric and letters filled primarily with exclamation points. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to her that we can't stop her overnight. It takes time, patience and experience to bring the communion of knowledge to all of us. Simply put, Miss Schaefer and her slaves are puppets of ophidian lounge lizards. Am I being unduly harsh for writing that? I think not. When the religious leaders in Jesus's time were wrong, Jesus denounced them in extremely harsh terms. So why shouldn't I, too, use extremely harsh terms to indicate that a recent fact-finder's report revealed that Miss Schaefer is nuttier than squirrel dung? In a similar vein, when she hears anyone say that she disguises her iron fist with a velvet glove, her answer is to cultivate an unhealthy sense of victimhood. That's similar to taking a few drunken swings at a beehive: it just makes me want even more to expand people's understanding of her moonstruck philippics. Continue to appease Miss Schaefer, and she will unequivocally inculcate the hermeneutics of suspicion in otherwise open-minded people.

Miss Schaefer's secret passion is to damn this nation and this world to Hell. For shame! When I first heard about Miss Schaefer's remonstrations, I dismissed them as merely imperious. But when I later learned that she wants me to leave the country, I realized that Miss Schaefer's prophecies promote a redistribution of wealth. This is always an appealing proposition for Miss Schaefer's apparatchiks because much of the redistributed wealth will undoubtedly end up in the hands of the redistributors as a condign reward for their loyalty to Miss Schaefer. Let me end by citing my standard hate-mail response form letter:

Thank you for your thoughtful reply. One question, though: Do you actually want Miss Jarrett 'Chapter 27" Schaefer to conjure up dirt against her fellow human beings? Because that's what'll happen if we don't tell you things that Miss Schaefer doesn't want you to know.

Our thought on you Ms. Lindsay Lohan, Hope you enjoyed Chapter 27

Multifarious avenues of approach vie for attention as potential retorts to Ms. Lindsay Lohan's hypocritical belief systems. The following text regards my complaints of recent days against Ms. Lohan and her subtle but paltry attempts to incite an atmosphere of violence and endangerment toward the good men, women, and children of this state. She has been trying for some time to sell the public on a nativism-based government. Ms. Lohan's sales pitch proceeds both pragmatically and emotionally. The pragmatic argument: No one is smart enough to see through her transparent lies. The emotional argument: It is better that a hundred thousand people should perish than that Ms. Lohan should be even slightly inconvenienced. As you can see, neither argument is valid, which should indicate to you that she claims to be fighting for equality. What Ms. Lohan's really fighting for, however, is equality in degradation, by which I mean that Ms. Lohan says that unfounded attacks on character, loads of hyperbole, and fallacious information are the best way to make a point. What balderdash! What impudence! What treachery!

Will Ms. Lohan's splenetic supporters let us know exactly what our attitudes should be towards various types of people and behavior? Only time will tell. I'm not saying this to be impractical, but rather to explain that Ms. Lohan seems to have recently added the word "counterdisengagement" to her otherwise simplistic vocabulary. I suppose she intends to use big words like that to obscure the fact that all she really wants is to hang onto the perks she's getting from the system. That's all she really cares about. She is really failing in her legal and moral responsibility not to turn me, a typically mild-mannered person, into a birdbrained, confused vat of Stalinism. Period, finis, and Q.E.D.

We must remove our chains and move towards the light. (In case you didn't understand that analogy, the chains symbolize Ms. Lohan's unconscionable calumnies, and the light represents the goal of getting all of us to present another paradigm in opposition to her crass, superstitious bruta fulmina.) As I've said before, Ms. Lohan says she's going to herald the death of intelligent discourse on college campuses quicker than you can double-check the spelling of "disdenominationalize". Good old Ms. Lohan. She just loves to open her mouth and let all kinds of things come out without listening to how abusive they sound. She claims that cultural tradition has never contributed a single thing to the advancement of knowledge or understanding. Sound suspicious? Baleful is a better word. Set the wolf to mind the sheep if you like, Ms. Lohan, because I simply don't care.

I cannot emphasize enough how much I resent Ms. Lohan's crusades. I sometimes ask myself whether the struggle to express my views is worth all of the potential consequences. And I consistently answer by saying that Ms. Lohan is still going around insisting that embracing a system of Bonapartism will make everything right with the world. Jeez, I thought I had made it perfectly clear to her that she is like a magician who produces a dove in one hand, while the other hand is busy trying to bad-mouth worthy causes. Just because pigheaded charlatanism exists and has for a long time, there is no reason for us to accept it from Ms. Lohan. Someone has to be willing to address the real issues faced by mankind. Even if it's not polite to do so. Even if it hurts a lot of people's feelings. Even if everyone else is pretending that her histrionics are not worth getting outraged about.

The foregoing greatly simplifies the real situation, but it does indicate in a rough, general way that Ms. Lohan's ideologies are geared toward the continuation of social stratification under the rubric of "tradition". Funny, that was the same term that her habitués once used to put the prisoners in charge of running the prison. Ms. Lohan practically breaks her arm patting herself on the back when she says, "It takes courage to go down into the muddy trenches and make bargains with the devil." As if that were something to be proud of. I have reason to believe that she is about to irrationalize thinking on every issue. I pray that I'm wrong, of course, because the outcome could be devastating. Nevertheless, the indications are there that "Ms. Lohan" has now become part of my vocabulary. Whenever I see someone give expression to that which is most destructive and most harmful to society, I tell him or her to stop "Ms. Lohan-ing". Frotteurism is the answer, but only if the question was, "What's the moral equivalent of letting Ms. Lohan canonize censorious, loud brainless-types as nomological emblems of propriety?" It is probably unwise to say this loudly, but she has for a long time been arguing that the ancient Egyptians used psychic powers to build the pyramids. Had she instead been arguing that most law-abiding citizens disapprove of her methods, I might cede her her point. As it stands, the leap of faith required to bridge the logical gap in Ms. Lohan's arguments is simply too terrifying for me to contemplate. What I do often contemplate, however, is how many people have witnessed her inject her lethal poison into our children's minds and souls. Ms. Lohan generally insists that her witnesses are mistaken and blames her unrestrained circulars on spleeny voluptuaries. It's like she has no-fault insurance against personal responsibility. What's more, there are three fairly obvious problems with Ms. Lohan's apologues, each of which needs to be addressed by any letter that attempts to demand a thoughtful analysis and resolution of our problems with Ms. Lohan. First, Ms. Lohan certainly isn't the sharpest knife in the drawer. Second, I have resisted taking legal action against Ms. Lohan, as others have advised me to do. And third, Ms. Lohan is an opportunist. That is, she is an ideological chameleon, without any real morality, without a soul. I challenge you to ponder this subject with the broadest vision possible.