Thoughts on Jared Leto and Chapter 27

This letter is not a debate contest in which I convince you to agree with me or vice versa. This letter is concerned only with establishing the truth about Mr. Jared Leto. What follows is a call to action for those of us who care -- a large enough number to do what comes naturally.

My mother always told me, "If you don't have something intelligent to say, just keep quiet." Apparently, Mr. Leto's mother never told him that. I was, however, going to forget about the whole thing when it suddenly occurred to me that all the deals Mr. Leto makes are strictly one-way. Mr. Leto gets all the rights, and the other party gets all the obligations. He has a knack for convincing snarky scallawags that children should belong to the state. That's called marketing. The underlying trick is to use sesquipedalian terms like "anthropomorphologically" and "transubstantiationalist" to keep his sales pitch from sounding craven. That's why you really have to look hard to see that when Mr. Leto says that honor counts for nothing, that's just a load of spucatum tauri.

I find that I am embarrassed. Embarrassed that some people just don't realize that Mr. Leto has been trying to convince us that we ought to worship the worst types of possession-obsessed, ornery humanity-haters there are as folk heroes. This pathetic attempt to trample over the very freedoms and rights that he claims to support deserves no comment other than to say that Mr. Leto might shred the basic compact between the people and their government when you least expect it. What are we to do then? Place blinders over our eyes and hope we don't see the horrible outcome? I have seen and heard enough. Now, it is time to seek liberty, equality, and fraternity. Yes, Mr. Leto may be nothing more than a disposable tool of power-wielding, illiberal sandbaggers, but if we take his taradiddles to their logical conclusion, we see that in the immediate years ahead, he will doctor evidence and classification systems and make grungy generalizations to support yawping, preconceived views. Irreligionism is a crime, an outrage, and a delusion. However true that is, anyone who has spent much time wading through the pious, obscurantist, jargon-filled cant that now passes for "advanced" thought in the humanities already knows that this is a stark reality that no impartial analyst can choose to ignore. What may be news, however, is that Mr. Leto refers to a variety of things using the word "phenolsulphonephthalein". Translating this bit of jargon into English isn't easy. Basically, he's saying that advertising is the most veridical form of human communication, which we all know is patently absurd. At any rate, he keeps trying to dump effluent into creeks, lakes, streams, and rivers. And if we don't remain eternally vigilant, he will doubtlessly succeed. No one that I speak with or correspond with is happy about this situation. Of course, I don't speak or correspond with disingenuous, unrealistic flag burners, Mr. Leto's allies, or anyone else who fails to realize that I and Mr. Leto part company when it comes to the issue of radicalism. He feels that without his superior guidance, we will go nowhere, while I maintain that if you've never seen him inflict untold misery, suffering, and distress, you're either incredibly unobservant or are concealing the truth from yourself.

I'm not very conversant with Mr. Leto's background. To be quite frank, I don't care to be. I already know enough to state with confidence that if we are powerless to address the continued social injustice shown by lewd insurrectionists, it is because we have allowed Mr. Leto to lead me down a path of pain and suffering. If he thinks his prognoses represent progress, Mr. Leto should rethink his definition of progress. Daily, the truth is being impressed upon us that there are some purblind present-day robber barons who are clumsy. There are also some who are covinous. Which category does Mr. Leto fall into? If the question overwhelms you, I suggest you check "both". Some people are responsible and others are not. Mr. Leto falls into the category of "not".

Well, sure; this is neither a document written in anger nor something I am being paid to write, but that doesn't change reality. Mr. Leto twists every argument into some sort of "struggle" between two parties. Mr. Leto unvaryingly constitutes the underdog party, which is what he claims gives him the right to show us a gross miscarriage of common judgment. While his asseverations may seem testy, they're in agreement with his slovenly, hotheaded bruta fulmina. Mr. Jared Leto's insults are mired in hypersensitive sexism. So I give you this letter. I hope it helps.

The curse of Chapter 27 continues

As stated in numerous previous posts, the CURSE OF CHAPTER 27 continues. From Leto's Gout to Lohans latest arrest, when will they realize theat "INSTANT KARMAS GONNA GET YA"



Lindsay Lohan was arrested early Saturday morning after driving drunk and crashing her car, according to police reports, and the cops found what they believe to be cocaine in the troubled actress' car. The sordid history of problems with Lindsay Lohan only seems to be getting worse as time goes on. Lindsay Lohan has been in and out of rehab at least once already, has admitted to being in AA, and she's not even 21 yet. According to witnesses, the Georgia Rule star was driving on Sunset Boulevard in Hollywood at about 5:30am on Saturday morning when her Mercedes convertible jumped a curb and flew into a set of trees. According to ABC News, Lindsay Lohan jumped out of the car and ran into a nearby house. A photographer who was following her named Perry Farinola told ABC, "I quickly got out of my car and said, 'Lindsay are you ok?' and she didn't really respond, she was moving fast." Farinola reported that Lindsay Lohan then got into another car and that he didn't believe that she had been drinking that night.

The police didn't agree with the assessment of the paparazzi and charged Lindsay Lohan with drunk driving. Lt. Mitch McCann of the Beverly Hills Police Department told the press on Saturday, "Officers tracked Miss Lohan to the local hospital where she ultimately was placed under arrest for ... driving under the influence." Lindsay Lohan left the scene of the crime and ended up at an L.A. hospital, where she was arrested. Doctors treated Lindsay Lohan for minor injuries at the hospital.

Meanwhile, the police were impounding the car driven that night by Lindsay Lohan and they found something pretty incriminating. According to McCann, "It was a usable amount of illegal narcotics that was preliminarily identified as cocaine."

According to ABC News, this weekend's incident marks the third car accident for Lindsay Lohan in the last two years. The arraignment for Ms. Lohan will be on August 24th and the police have said that Lindsay could face additional charges. ABC spoke to Ronald Richards, a Beverly Hills attorney, who believes that Lindsay Lohan could face a similar fate to fellow celebrity icon Paris Hilton and actually do time - "It is a very serious misdemeanor on the panaloply of misdemeanors, and then you have the DUI. She could be looking at a lot of classes and a lot of community service."

Lindsay Lohan is a member of Alcoholics Anonymous, even though she's not legally old enough to drink yet. That date will come on July 2nd. After the most recent Golden Globe Awards, Lindsay Lohan went on a drinking binge and ended up in the Wonderland rehab centre. And now Svedka is sponsoring her birthday party. AA and Wonderland might have a thing or two to say about that. Mother Dina Lohan recently confirmed that Lindsay Lohan is still attending AA.

Lindsay Lohan will next be seen I Know Who Killed Me and Chapter 27 and, for now, you can still catch Georgia Rule in theaters. The 20-year-old Lohan, most recently named the hottest woman in the world by Maxim, can also be caught on DVD in The Parent Trap, Freaky Friday, Confessions of a Teenage Drama Queen, Mean Girls, Herbie Fully Loaded, A Prairie Home Companion, Just My Luck, and Bobby.

JOHN LENNON

Thoughts on John Lennon, a man, an extraordinary being of true self, worth, and happiness. John Lennon, a man of substance, a man of that could testify the bounds of human thoughts and emotion, a man that goes down as a legend not only as a rock star but also as a man of political stance from an artists point of view. He was a poet of beautiful lyrics, supplemental songs, songs of emotion and self worth. John Lennon was a type of person that will only come around for decades to come! John Lennon was a leader of success.

Success for John Lennon started at an early age defining what family actually stood for. This article however, is not about his family, his music, or his lifestyle. This article is about John Lennon the man!

John Lennon began a world known historical revolution with the band "The Beatles" sweeping youngsters off of there feet and changing the way music is heard in todays music nation. John Lennon had an amazing voice and played instruments with amazing dedication and heart. He, at an early age with the Beatles was about rebellion, of which later in his career would follow him to the grave only to be killed by a person looking for fame and stardom only to be banished by the world.

John Lennon lived a life that only those would dream about living, about getting there voice heard, recognized, and heard again. He used his music to speak to a mass of individuals in a political sense and believed in his music and his thoughts so much, that people would relate to him as a man of nurture as a part of nature.

John Lennon would walk the bounds of politics to challenge the way society relates to the everyday situation. His beliefs were so strong to him that he did not mind a good challenge. He did not care what people thought of him. He was a man of substance and he knew it!

Although, John was not a political voice in his time here, he was political and was perceived political in the voice he was sending through his music. His music only to be world known and followed since he was a member of one of the greatest bands to set forth on this earth. Politics, followed John, which in turn John followed politics since he did walk the line on a few occasions with the law.

The Vietnam War was a time of political turmoil in the United States with corrupt leaders leading our way to the life of liberty and happiness or so it is called. The Vietnam War was the most disputed war in American history and culture. It brought forth a decade of the flower era, the time of hippies, a time of piece, a time of political opinion. This political opinion is what brought John Lennon, the man, into the sullen eyes of reality.

John Lennon used his voice through his music, and Yoko Ono, his wife at the time of this great American conflict between the corrupt leaders and the wave of political activists during this decade of blood shed and war. John, which was never a big political voice and never saw himself as a political figure, took a stand through his education and his music that he sung. "Give Peace a Chance" started a revolution on a world re known aspect of political sense and well being to human civilization. By this, he was launched into the American political scene due to being a foreigner and degrading the American way of life by singing about peace. This is crazy, are we Americans that bad in a sense to want to kill?

John Lennon spoke his voice along with other activist during the time of the war in the late 60's. All John ever wanted in life was to be in a rock-n-roll band. The Nixon administration changed John in a way in which John feared for his life. The Nixon Administration was scared and feared a man of cultural background and music, for John had the world behind him. His music was a major influence in societies younger generations. During the Nixon administration, the law was passed to let 18 to 21 year olds vote for the first time in American history. Is this why the government went after John? The answer is yes. The Leaders of our great nation started tapping John Lennon's phone, and the FBI would follow him to the grocery store or any routine thing that John would do. John was not hiding though, he was scared for his life in a sense for the government had an eye on him and he knew it.

John Lennon spoke through his music and people listened. Music at the time was very political and John was in the middle. John sang the song "Give Piece a Chance" to open the eyes of a natural human soul and to ask themselves why are we killing another to gain something. He was actually speaking for the world since he felt he was in that position to do so.

The government came down on John any way that the government could. The were trying to get him deported. The government felt that he was a nuisance to the American way of life. This is not true, John was trying to instill in the common American "Life, Liberty, and the Pursuit of Happiness" without killing a merciful soul of existence. He was shedding a thought deep from his mind that one way to do something isn't always the way to do something! Take a chance! Be Yourself! Live a Life of Happiness!

John Lennon will always have his voice heard even in this day and age. I am sad today, for he was shot by another human for his own thoughts and his ideas he expressed to a mass population, knowingly that he would be criticized. I have to live among people like this in todays society, it is cruel.

John Lennon you have my prayers!

Review of Chapter 27, just after Sundance

Rav starts talking about his love, Lindsay Lohan and CHAPTER 27 in Sundance!

Heya Guys,

So last night I watched one of the most buzzed about films here at Sundance, Chapter 27, it wasn’t buzzed because anyone had seen it, all the jibber-jabber was focused on Jared Leto/Lindsay Lohan starfucking and/or the move by a group of beatles fans to picket and boycott the film because it brings a sympathetic eye to MDC, the man who killed John Lennon.

Chapter 27 – Written and Directed by JP Schaffer

I originally took a stab at writing a review of this last night, but I trashed that after two tries, because very little happens for most of this movie in those reviews I merely tried giving a full-on scene-by-scene description of the entire movie. You can’t spoil a movie where nothing happens for 2 hours culminating with a forty-second assassination scene. But that was a big mistake, because every scene of the film of the film is so mundane that reading a list of them is about as interesting as reading a stranger’s grocery list. If anyone is still interested in knowing more about the movie after reading this review, I can email you one of those other too detailed reviews by request.

Except for about a minute of documentary footage the entire film follows around MDC (Jared Leto) through his days in New York prior to assassinating Lennon. Unfortunately these days are mostly spent asking people in front of the Dakota building if Lennon is coming back anytime soon or standing at the corner of the building holding a record of Lennon’s that he tells people he is trying to get autographed. To try to make things more interesting the entire film is full of MDC internal monologue via spastic voice-over, unfortunately he never says anything quite interesting.

I don’t know why anyone would make this film, it doesn’t get in the mind of Chapman at all or tell anything interesting whatsoever. For the few minutes of the film that Chapman actually interacts with people rather than staring around and contemplating his repetitive voice-over thought nothing interesting happens. Lindsay Lohan plays a Beatles fan that occasionally spends time at the Dakota hoping to get a glimpse of Lennon. Unfortunately her character only has about five to ten minutes of screen-time and like most of the film very little happens in her presence except for a very awkward scene where she introduces MDC to toddler Sean Lennon. If you go in expecting Lohan to be a co-star in the film you are going to be quite disappointed, nonetheless she does a wonderful job in the little bit that she appears in the film.

The other character (other than Dakota doormen, taxi drivers, and a silent hooker) that MDC encounters is a paparazzi’sh photographer played by Judah Friedlander. Judah has about five more minutes than Lohan does in the movie, but it’s still stretching to even call it a supporting role. Judah’s major moment is toward the end of the movie he takes a photo of MDC getting an autograph from Lennon and agrees to sell the photo to MDC the next day for fifty dollars. Judah is also pretty good the little he is in the movie.

Jared Leto gives what could be an academy award winning performance in this boring shitty movie. He’s gained a lot of weight for his role in the film, unfortunately the director wants to ingrain this fact into your mind by obsessively photographing his naked belly for five or more minutes in his crappy motel room. Leto also has mastered the voice of MDC, but too bad he spends most of the movie repeating the same spastic voice-over thoughts.

Tom Richmond was working on overdrive when he shot this movie, every scene is wonderfully photographed very dark and murkily. It very much suits the insanity of Chapman, but a well-photographed image can only go so far. The best thing about the movie actually is Anthony Marinelli. Just like Leto, Marinelli has delivered an award-winning score for what is a very crappy movie. At times the score nearly convinces you that you are watching tense and emotional sequences as you watch Chapman just standing around or bundling up in the cold.

After watching the movie I still have no idea why MDC killed John Lennon, the only thing I know is that he’s crazy and in the last bit of text apparently he’s a born-again Christian now. See this movie only if you are interested in watching shots of Jared Leto standing in the cold or crossing streets while thinking “maybe I shouldn’t kill him
nah I gotta kill him” for a hundred or so minutes.

It’s kind of a depressing thought that this will probably get picked up this weekend for a ton of money. Between the photography, the cast, and the score one could cut a very good trailer for the movie and fool people into watching it. I feel for all the people at boycottchapter27.org now, I thought they were kind of wacky at first, but to be honest this is a very shitty movie that was made in the worst of taste, so it probably should be boycotted as it’s basically just exploiting the death of john lennon and seems to glorify MDC's insanity.

TV Guide blogs about your boycott of Chapter 27

Reprinted below is a blog written by an editor at tvguide.com, it is from a while back, but we just ran across it.

John Lennon Fans Take Aim at Lindsay Lohan Film
Fans of the late John Lennon are calling for a boycott of Chapter 27, a critically hailed (yet not picked up at Sundance) look at MDC (played by Jared Leto), claiming its release would fulfill Chapman's prophecy of becoming famous by murdering Lennon. Some protesters are even lobbing death threats at Lindsay Lohan, who costars in the film. "It's nonsense," exec producer John Flock tells the New York Daily News, pointing out that Chapter 27's take on Chapman is not sympathetic, and "he comes off as a monster in the end."

Elsewhere, Lohan is back at work on her stripper pic I Know Who Killed Me, but, post-rehab, is said to be "moody," "late" and "miserable" on the set, spies tell the New York Post. Also, out of fear of pushing herself too hard, La Lo has bailed on her next project, A Woman of No Importance, in which she was to costar with Annette Bening.


PEACE

Heyyy Nowwww

F...Stuttering John and Jackie..(switch en it up player)

Boycott Chapter 27 . org brings you a special presentation

Enjoy this video demonstration...You will be directed away from our page...but its worth it..come back and sign our petition.




PEACE


Heyyy Nowwww
F...Jackie and Stuttering John
Hiiii Fred

The Aftermath & Some More Thoughts To Share (Chapter 27)

This is my first post to this board in a long time.I am sorry that I have not been contributing to this but I have not jumped ship nor given up the cause.I am still in the battle and I am just happy that the results have been in our favor,so far.It was a hard fought battle but at least,Chapter 27 will never see a US movie theatre.Since no distributor has picked it up,we can now smile and say WE WON.

After the dismal reception that the film received at Sundance and AFM,we can now smile and lift our glasses high and drink up.I know that the battle is not truly over yet.There is still the matter of the film coming straight to DVD.But I am going to continue to honor the memory and legacy of John Lennon by not renting it.I have seen some clips from it and as the reviewer who saw it at AFM said,"Leto's performance as the murderer is boring",I do have to agree.Leto was boring as the man who murdered John Lennon.Again,I am not renting this when it comes to Blockbuster or even Hollywood Video when it released for rental.In this way,I am going to honor the memory and legacy of "One of the greatest men who ever lived" by avoiding this "worthless excuse of a movie" that glorifies THAT MAN who murdered him.THAT MAN has already become famous for doing that dastardly deed.He does not need to be even more famous than he is already.This movie should not have been made in the first place.Again,I am going to honor John Lennon by avoiding this movie like the plague.

I have also stopped by the Internet Movie Database (imdb.com) recently and believe it or not,before the fate of being released "direct to DVD", Peace Arch had been lying to people that finding a US theatrical distributor was on the backburner and that the film was going to get a theatrical release.I read it all on the message boards on the site on the Chapter 27 page.Yes,they were lying to people who knew them and said that the release plans were "Put on the backburner"and that the rumors were false and that the boycotting of the movie had not changed a thing.Apparently,they were toying with people's faith in this film that actually belongs in the trash bin and not on DVD.How pathetic can you get?Apparently,at the time before the DVD plans,Peace Arch wanted to keep hopes alive but unfortunately,Peace Arch wound up being total losers in this whole fiasco and tried to make fools out of people through false hope.Oh well.That is the way the cookie crumbles or as Frank Sinatra would sing "That's Life."

By the way,I did manage to check out some of the comments that were left by anonymous visitors to the site.What I read really frosted me to the point where I thought that they were desecrating the USA.Some of the anonymous comments compared Chapter 27 to movies such as World Trade Center and United 93.This is what made me angry.How could these people,who were too chicken to leave their names in the first place,compare a movie that glorifies a murderer with movies that paid honor to those who lost their lives by giving of themselves to save others lives on the fateful day known as 9/11/01 when terrorists hit our shores and crashed passenger planes into the World Trace Center,Pentagon and Rural Pennsylvania.Not only that,I also thought "How Dare They Even Do That?" and also "What Nerve?" World Trade Center and United 93 were different altogether in terms of why they were made.Both these films paid honor,respects and homage to the brave souls who lost their lives that fateful day known as "The Day The World Stopped Turning".Those brave souls lost their lives by giving of their lives in an attempt to save the lives of others who were trapped in the twin towers and in the Pentagon on September 11th 2001.Those two movies do not honor the terrorists nor do they glorifiy what the terrorists did on our soil.It pays tribute to those who gave of themselves unselfishly to make sure that other people would live to see another day.Of course,over 3,000 lives were still lost but those films also honor those innocent Americans who lost their lives that day and it also reminds their loved ones that they will never be forgotten nor will their memories die.On the other hand,Chapter 27 glorifies a man who murdered a much loved and respected man.A man who loved and prayed for the human race.A man who also showed us through his music that peace and love for one another are the only ways.Chapter 27 also gives THAT MAN more fame and notoriety that he truly does not deserve.He is already famous enough.He doesn't need to be even more famous.THAT MAN simply wants to stay in the public consciousness and this movie only affirms what THAT MAN wants.Again,THAT MAN does not deserve any more fame or notoriety.He has enough.He does not need even more.

To those who made those inexcusable comparisons.You ought to be ashamed of yourselves.There is no excuse to compare Chapter 27 to World Trade Center and United 93.The latter movies pay honor and tribute to the fallen heroes and the innocent Americans who lost their lives that day on 9/11/01 and also honors those who lost their lives to save other people's lives from the burning buildings and to those who lost their lives to stop the terrorists from crashing a plane into another tall building.Not only that,those movies do not honor those responsible for the attacks on American soil.Chapter 27 is the exact opposite.It glorifies the killing of a great man and it awards his killer with even more fame by keeping his name and presence in the public consciousness.I hope that you all learned your lesson.If not,then OH WELL!Some people never learn.

Thanks to Howard for keeping in touch with me and for his patience.I really appreciated all of that.Thanks also for the kind encouragement.

Peace Archs last ditch effort to save from losing millions on Chapter 27

In a final effort to save themselves from losing an estimated $25 million dollars because of lack of US distribution of Chapter 27, Peace Arch Entertainment has purchased a US based DVD distribution company with ties to US retailers. Thanks to all of your efforts, this film will not be seen in theater, now we move the fight to the world of rental and DVD retail. We will concentrate our efforts on making Blockbuster, WalMart, and Best Buy how we feel about Chapter 27. We will work to keep this horrible film from seeing store shelves. Where Lindsey Lohan and Jared Letos images will sell DVD's to 15 year old girls, helping them to "understand" why an animal would kill a genius....FOR FAME

Peace Arch Entertainment Announces Agreement to Acquire Leading DVD Distributor Trinity Home Entertainment to Expand Into Lucrative U.S. Market

Landmark Acquisition of Established Distributor to Accelerate Commercialization of Peace Arch's Recently Acquired Library

TORONTO--(BoycottÇhapter27.org)--May 9, 2007 -- Peace Arch® Entertainment Group Inc. (AMEX:PAE - News) (Toronto:PAE.TO - News), an innovative filmgroup of heartless dirtbags and television entertainment( yes, very entertaining...not!!) company, announced today that it has agreed to acquire the Westlake Village, California-based DVD distributor Trinity Home Entertainment, LLC for approximately USD$10.0 million in a last ditch attempt to save their asses. Trinity, which had unaudited revenues of approximately USD$19.0 million and normalized net income of approximately USD$2.5 million for the year ending December 31, 2006, is one of the leading independent distributors of budget and first-run feature films in the United States.

Trinity has well established distribution relationships with the Army and Air Force Exchange Service, along with major retailers such as (We will ensure that Chapter 27 never sees the shelves of these retailers) Wal-Mart Stores and Trans World Entertainment, two of the largest video retailers in the United States. Genius Entertainment and Hearst Entertainment are among Trinity's key content suppliers.

"Trinity is a well run operation, who sold out to a group of money grubbing scum with top notch distribution relationships and an excellent sales force," said John Flock, President of Peace Arch Entertainment. "By integrating Trinity's operation with Peace Arch's DVD distribution division in Canada, Peace Arch now has a platform upon which to build one of the leading distribution companies in North America."

With Peace Arch's annual slate of more than a dozen direct-to-video productions and its extensive supply of high quality feature films acquired through the recent purchase of Castle Hill Productions and Dream LLC in December, Trinity also provides a natural outlet for Peace Arch's expanding line-up of top quality content. The acquisition furthers Peace Arch's strategy of building its in-house distribution capabilities while continuing to aggregate highly marketable film and television content.

Under the terms of the deal, Peace Arch will acquire all of the shares of Trinity for approximately USD$9.5 million in cash and USD$500,000 of Peace Arch common stock. The final purchase price will be subject to adjustment upon completion of Peace Arch's due diligence and the acquisition is expected to close by the end of June.

Trinity's extensive library includes such genre classics as Stephen King's "Maximum Overdrive," "Raw Deal" starring Arnold Schwarzenegger and "The Octagon" featuring Chuck Norris.

"We are very pleased to enter into this agreement with Peace Arch and combine our U.S. distribution expertise with their worldwide sales force and extensive library of desirable properties," said Phillip Knowles, President of Trinity Home Entertainment.

"With Peace Arch's seasoned management and growing financial strength in our corner, we believe we can now accelerate the growth of our business into one of the top distributors in the United States."

Knowles, who founded Trinity in 1999, will remain with the company as President and head its U.S. DVD distribution operations.

In connection with its acquisition of Trinity, Peace Arch has entered into an agreement with an agent (the "Agent") for an equity financing. The private placement offering (the "Offering") will be on a best efforts basis and will consist of up to CDN$33.0 million in Common Shares. The additional proceeds from the Offering will be used for debt reduction and general corporate purposes, including other potential future acquisitions. In addition, CPC Communications Inc., a company controlled by Gary Howsam, the Chief Executive Officer of Peace Arch, has granted the Agent a closing option (the "Closing Option") exercisable at closing to purchase up to 2,833,000 Common Shares held by CPC at no less than the offering price pursuant to the Offering.

The Offering is scheduled to close on or about June 8, 2007 and is subject to regulatory approvals and completion of definitive documentation.

About Peace Arch Entertainment Group Inc.

Peace Arch Entertainment produces and acquires feature films, television and home entertainment content for distribution to worldwide markets. Peace Arch owns one of the largest libraries of top quality independent feature films in the world, featuring more than 500 classic and contemporary titles. Through its subsidiary, Peace Arch Home Entertainment, Peace Arch is also one of the leading distributors of DVDs and related products in Canada.

CAUTIONARY STATEMENT

YOU WILL LOSE YOUR ASS INVESTING WITH THIS COMPANY!!!

No stock exchange, securities commission or other regulatory authority has approved the information contained herein. The closing of the transactions described herein is subject to the negotiation and execution of definitive documentation and the approval of the Toronto Stock Exchange and the American Stock Exchange.

Forward-Looking Statements

INSTANT KARMAS GONNA GET YA!!!!

This press release includes statements that may constitute forward-looking statements, usually containing the words "believe," "estimate," "project," "expect," or similar expressions. These statements are made pursuant to the safe harbor provisions of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995. Forward-looking statements inherently involve risks and uncertainties that could cause actual results to differ materially from the forward-looking statements. Factors that would cause or contribute to such differences include, but are not limited to, continued acceptance of the Company's products and services in the marketplace, competitive factors, dependence upon third-party vendors, availability of capital and other risks detailed in the Company's periodic report filings with the Securities and Exchange Commission. By making these forward-looking statements, the Company undertakes no obligation to update these statements for revisions or changes after the date of this release.

THESE SECURITIES HAVE NOT BEEN REGISTERED UNDER THE UNITED STATES SECURITIES ACT OF 1933, AS AMENDED, OR ANY STATE SECURITIES LAWS, AND MAY NOT BE OFFERED OR SOLD IN THE UNITED STATES OR TO U.S. PERSONS UNLESS REGISTERED OR EXEMPT THEREFROM.

Distributed by Filing Services Canada and retransmitted by Market Wire


Contact:

Contact:
Roy Bodner
Vice President Public Relations
Peace Arch Entertainment
(310) 776-7208
Email Contact: Email Contact

Financial Communications
Trilogy Capital Partners
Ryon Harms
(800) 592-6067
Email Contact: Email Contact

The goal of Boycottchapter27.org

The following quote is from an article on "Chapter 27" in boxoffice.com:

"The protestors [ers] who have organized against the film can put down their placards. They will be relieved to learn that the problem with Chapter 27 isn’t that it humanizes Mark David Chapman but that it fails to humanize him enough." - Ray Greene

While the notion of "humanizing" this terrorist is troublesome to boycottchapter27.org and its supporters, this is not the primary motivation for protesting the release of the film. The bottom line is and has always been that given his motivation to kill (fame), the film directly rewards a murderer by giving him the fame he so desires. In addition, it takes "killing for fame" from a ridiculous concept to a viable option for psychotics that will do anything to relieve the pangs of their painful inferiority complex. Considering the string of violent killings that have occurred in schools alone over the last several years - the most recent claiming 32 innocent lives, can we really afford to send out this message? What must also be considered is that many, many films have been blamed for spinning off copycat crimes. God forbid this film be added to that list. It is too great a risk.

All We Are Saying... is please understand our message before criticizing or minimizing it. In addition to viciously tossing salt into Yoko's wounds and giving notoriety to the assassin, all possible ramifications of releasing this film must be considered.

Boycott Chapter 27 presents a soldiers animation

This is a very scary piece of animation. The work was done by a US soldier fighting in Iraq. Imagine the talent lost if he had been killed.

PEACE




This is not directly related to Chapter 27 or our Boycott, but it is even more important to work spreading a message of peace. A message that could be delivered by John Lennon, had he not been taken from this world by a maniac seeking fame.
Lohan, Leto, and Peace Arch Entertainment are working hard to give this murdering dirtbag the fame he was seeking.

F...Jackie and Stuttering John

Hiiii Fred

Heyyyy NOWWWWW

Boycott Chapter 27 brings you this message of Peace

In expanding our scope of focus and working to keep John Lennons dream of Peace alive, we bring you this ad developed by Oliver Stone.

PEACE




F...Lindsey "Fire Crotch" Lohan, Jared Leto, and Peace Arch Entertainment.

Instant Karmas Gonna Get You

Heyyyy Nowww!!!!
Hiiii Fred

Boycott Chapter 27 wants to offer a special thanks to "this_guy"

This was found as a comment on a blog of some 16 year old with a crush on Jared Leto,
if she only knew who John Lennon was...but now she will only know his killer:

I've posted about it a few times, but I really...oh my god. This pisses me off, Jared Leto or no Jared Leto.

It's a movie about the man who shot John Lennon. It's a very objective look at what happened, not trying to paint MDC in any kind of light, just telling it like it is. One of the arguments is that this movie is making him famous, which is what the killer was after, supposedly.

MDC was famous the moment he pulled the trigger. That's what did it. Making a very generic (in the sense of any kind of empathy for the character) movie about the event isn't going to make him anymore famous than he already is.

MDC was a very fucked up individual, and what he did was...it was shocking, terrifying heart-breaking and world changing. Whether we like it or not, it happened, and so fucking what if an artist read a book and decided he wanted to explore it cinematically.

I've seen the movie, and it's very well done. There is nothing that sheds any kind of positive light on the killer. It generates more heartache over John Lennon's death, and it made me appreciate what he meant to this world.

Now that that's done, I think I want to buy a domain that would be supporting the release of the movie. I don't know if there are any, but I really really feel compelled to do so. What do you think, feel like giving me some thoughts on all this?

THE RESPONSE....


I've never seen the film, but I've got to say that if I was forced to choose sides, and deal with losing friends over one or the other, I'd choose to boycott Chapter 27.

By this, I mean, people in the Lennon camp are unhappy with the actors for doing the movie. Lindsay Lohan, etc., are losing friends for doing it. I imagine that some people in the Lennon camp are losing friends who feel the movie is a good idea.

I love John Lennon. I choose that side.

The bottom line really isn't whether it's right or wrong. John Lennon's widow, his best friend, his surviving son have asked the world not to give the killer any more attention than he has already received. They made a request to honor their dead loved one. Who are we to not honor that?

I am an artist, a writer, a person who believes that all the world should be in the realm of use by an artist for self expression... but the line is drawn when someone requests that something be left unsaid. It's disrespectful to the dead, and that's final.

This might be something that is hard for people to understand who weren't alive when John Lennon died. My mother was, and she knows the way the world shook when it happened... it's one of those things that you remember where you were standing when it happened. It was bigger than anything you can imagine. The Beatles were a phenomenon unlike any band before them, or any band since. There is no comparison.

As someone who's father has died, I understand some of it. I get irritated when a movie cops out in the end, and the character dies of brain cancer. I feel like these movies are made for everyone's entertainment and education but my own. I can't imagine if my father were murdered, and someone took his story and made a movie about any aspect of it at all without my permission, and made money and gained fame for the killer. It doesn't matter what the killer wants, only the family that is left behind.